Click
Just wanted to see what you guys thought about all this.
Full Version: Mt. St. Helens
i voted for the third option...sorta.
I think the eruption is pretty much over. I do expect, however, some lava to ooze out and potentially cause a small lahar.
I think the eruption is pretty much over. I do expect, however, some lava to ooze out and potentially cause a small lahar.
It's going to be the geological equivelent of a mild fart.
It already errupted 3 hours before this post started (erruption was at 12:03 PST). 
It went up 2,000 feet and was just steam with some ash.
The quakes have significantly slowed down, so they're pretty much figuring that was it. These kind of erruptions happened a ton between 1981? through 1986 which was when the last erruption occured.
And just FYI - I live 50 miles from St. Helens. I can see it on a clear day.
where is the "Mt. Saint Helens is going to blow up so catastrophically, it caused a veritable nuclear winter, forcing the world into hiding for the next 1000 years. During the time, man will develop the uncanny ability to tunnel with a newly evolved third arm."?
It did blow up catastrophically in 1980 and all that happened is we got a few inches (I think - wasn't born yet) of ash here. Well, everywhere actually. Ash landed in many places around the globe.
QUOTE(BankieVR6 @ Oct 1 2004, 03:06 PM)
where is the "Mt. Saint Helens is going to blow up so catastrophically, it caused a veritable nuclear winter, forcing the world into hiding for the next 1000 years. During the time, man will develop the uncanny ability to tunnel with a newly evolved third arm."?
That fits under "Mt. St. Helens is going to have a larger eruption than in 1980"
its gonna blow wohooo wohoo wo .... Volcano !!
QUOTE(DakianDelomast @ Oct 1 2004, 02:20 PM)
It's going to be the geological equivelent of a mild fart.
You should be a geologist or something man!
i live like 70 miles away, 20 miles way from viper. we watched this at our school during lunch. kinda boring, they say it might errupt again haha can't wait
Where are you Jadan?
And yeah, people have been evacutated back to 10 miles. They're saying there's a 50% of something significant happening within 36 hours as magma is moving towards the surface.
Press conference in 30.
And yeah, people have been evacutated back to 10 miles. They're saying there's a 50% of something significant happening within 36 hours as magma is moving towards the surface.
Press conference in 30.
QUOTE(Viper007Bond @ Oct 3 2004, 08:04 AM)
Where are you Jadan?
im in forest grove (about 20 min west of beaverton)
I have friend that has/had a perfect view of the good side of st helans that lives outside of portland.
Whom ever voted for the first option, a larger erruption than in 1980, should realize that it is not possible.
QUOTE(NorthPoint @ Oct 3 2004, 08:25 PM)
Whom ever voted for the first option, a larger erruption than in 1980, should realize that it is not possible.
Wow we have a bunch of retards on the forum don't we?
QUOTE(DakianDelomast @ Oct 3 2004, 08:38 PM)
Wow we have a bunch of retards on the forum don't we?
Sure but this isn't a revolutionary new thought to you is it?
QUOTE(fiber optic @ Oct 3 2004, 08:39 PM)
Sure but this isn't a revolutionary new thought to you is it?
Very true.
Wow nice one! I'll be watchin! In the US, do they say it'll happen any time soon?
i doubt it will be any bigger than in 1980, most likely it'll be the geological "fart" as dakian says
QUOTE(fallon @ Oct 5 2004, 12:36 AM)
i doubt it will be any bigger than in 1980, most likely it'll be the geological "fart" as dakian says
what if the geological fart were to turnout to be a geological explosive diahorrea ?? !1
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.