QUOTE(dukenukem @ Sep 25 2008, 12:56 AM)

If Dodge did infact change the appearance of the EV, people will still bitch at them for changing the looks of the Europa.
GM and Tesla got away with it.
QUOTE(Mitlov @ Sep 25 2008, 01:43 AM)

That doesn't make it a rebadge job, though. I mean, the classic example of lame rebadging was Chevy and Pontiac, where they'd make the exact same car with different bodywork. This carries forward to this day, where the Solstice and the Sky look very different, but under the bodywork, are the exact same stinkin' car. Same with the Cobalt and G5, the Lambda crossovers, etc.
On the other hand, if you put a Chevy small block in a Mazda RX-8 and put a Chevy badge on the hood, I certainly wouldn't call the resulting car "just a rebadged RX-8." The engine is the heart of a performance car, and if you put a completely different drivetrain in a sports car, it's not just a rebadge job.
First paragraph: The thing with Pontiac and Chevy is that they're both owned by GM. I don't necessarily like the model overlap, but they're technically the same damn company. In any case, there is a certain amount of visual distinction. Take a look at the Cobalt and G5, same car? Yes. Same styling? Not exactly.
Second paragraph: Lets say an RX8 with a Chevy is parked in the lot next to your car, and it's got some Chevy badges on it. Without looking under the hood, or hearing the engine, what do you think is going on?
I agree completely that the engine is the heart of a car, but the styling is its visual identity. Maybe I haven't been clear about this, but it's the lack of stylistic difference that bugs me.
Tesla, and GM have both built their own versions of the Elise at some point, and managed to make them look different. Suzuki just launched the Equator, which is a Frontier with a new front-end. The Dodge EV? Surely they could've been a little less lazy with the styling.