


QUOTE
Just over two years after debuting as a concept at the 2006 Detroit Auto Show, the Dodge Challenger is now ready to hit the streets for real. The Challenger is reviving a name last used in the late '70s and early '80s on a compact, four-cylinder Mitsubishi-built coupe. This time, though, Chrysler is going back to the roots of the brand with a big muscular rear-wheel-drive coupe, initially available exclusively with a 6.1L HEMI V8 that will power the new Challenger 60 mph in the low 5-second range, according to a very conservative Chrysler. It shares the automaker's LX platform with the Charger and Chrysler 300, and in final form, the car has changed remarkably little from the concept. The most noticeable differences are up front and include the loss of the cross-hair grille and a slim black air dam at the bottom of the bumper. Other changes are pretty subtle, such as some reshaping of the lower air intake.
Out back, the rear bumper is now more prominent and the detailing of the taillights has been revised. A flat black lip spoiler is now mounted on the trailing edge of the deck lid while the Challenger badges on the rear fenders have been dumped. The rear driver side fender now also features a prominent chrome fuel filler cap. The wheelbase of the LX platform has been shrunk from a gargantuan 120 inches for the sedans to a merely large 116 inches for the Challenger. That puts the span between the axles at 9 inches longer the Mustang, which aids interior volume. Read on after the jump for more.
Source:
Autoblog^ Shit loads of photos in Autoblog's gallery. Looks great, but we already knew that...
Benny
Feb 6 2008, 06:32 AM
its a challenger not a charger.
QUOTE(Benny @ Feb 6 2008, 06:32 PM)

its a challenger not a charger.
I knew that...
Benny
Feb 6 2008, 07:05 AM
but damn its gawdy.
fiber optic
Feb 6 2008, 07:57 AM
I'd almost swear that dashboard is a direct lift from a Chrysler 300. Not that I'm much of a dash stroker but it's just shameful a car with so much awesome has such a ho-hum snoozer interior.
dukenukem
Feb 6 2008, 08:08 AM
QUOTE(fiber optic @ Feb 6 2008, 09:57 AM)

I'd almost swear that dashboard is a direct lift from a Chrysler 300. Not that I'm much of a dash stroker but it's just shameful a car with so much awesome has such a ho-hum snoozer interior.
I addition to that i just want to punch whoever designed that steering wheel.
QUOTE(fiber optic @ Feb 6 2008, 07:57 PM)

I'd almost swear that dashboard is a direct lift from a Chrysler 300. Not that I'm much of a dash stroker but it's just shameful a car with so much awesome has such a ho-hum snoozer interior.
Bjorn
Feb 6 2008, 09:23 AM
I'm racking my brain for a Chrysler Group interior that wasn't awful...
IMHO they are by far the worst interior designers...they all feel cheap, and have sharp bits left over from the molding process.
^ When my dad and I test drove the Charger, we thought it wasn't at all that bad. Not the best built interiors, but still acceptable, at least in the case of the Charger.
Bjorn
Feb 6 2008, 09:49 AM
Maybe I'm just picky...But I really think that the effort put into the interior is a reflection of how much you care about the people buying your product. I don't need something flashy...but if you don't even take the time to polish off the flashings from the molded plastics, how much time did you spend making sure the engine was screwed together properly?
duality
Feb 6 2008, 09:51 AM
What a horrendous interior. It looks fine...but a bit bloated might I add.
maxima302
Feb 6 2008, 10:52 AM
I find myself wondering how a company that lost a billon last year has the time, resources, money, and administrative approval to carry out a project like this. Then I realize that most likely over 70% of the parts, both mechanical and cosmetic are from the parts bin, and that Chrysler execs have no intention of making any money.
Weren't people paying a couple hundred thousand for the first examples? Thats a lot of cash for a car with few model specific parts, which is one of the reasons why I doubt this car will ever become a huge collectible.
dukenukem
Feb 6 2008, 11:27 AM
QUOTE(maxima302 @ Feb 6 2008, 12:52 PM)

I find myself wondering how a company that lost a billon last year has the time, resources, money, and administrative approval to carry out a project like this. Then I realize that most likely over 70% of the parts, both mechanical and cosmetic are from the parts bin, and that Chrysler execs have no intention of making any money.
Weren't people paying a couple hundred thousand for the first examples? Thats a lot of cash for a car with few model specific parts, which is one of the reasons why I doubt this car will ever become a huge collectible.
If is dealer markup you are talking about then that goes to the dealership and not the company.
I believe Maxima's talking about the couple hundred thousand that was paid for the very first example at Barrett-Jackson.
fiber optic
Feb 6 2008, 12:16 PM
QUOTE(moethepaki @ Feb 6 2008, 11:48 AM)

They didn't even try to make it different!
Asher
Feb 6 2008, 12:43 PM
clarkma5
Feb 6 2008, 12:53 PM
Dash is a disappointment but I guess it gets the job done.
The styling is certainly a success, though, and Edmunds's first drive says the handling is up to par.
maxima302
Feb 6 2008, 04:23 PM
QUOTE(dukenukem @ Feb 6 2008, 11:27 AM)

If is dealer markup you are talking about then that goes to the dealership and not the company.
Actually it went to charity... at least the only that sold for hundreds-of-thousands. The point being that somebody saw a collectible value in the car. But other than the serial number, I doubt this car will carry much 40 years down the road because most of the parts are so generic.
Razor
Feb 6 2008, 05:19 PM
QUOTE(clarkma5 @ Feb 6 2008, 03:53 PM)

The styling is certainly a success, though, and Edmunds's first drive says the handling is up to par.
By "up to par" do you mean "average/meh" or better?
dukenukem
Feb 6 2008, 05:24 PM
Edmunds ArticleThe track that they are talking about is the same one i have raced on in the the rain and its ridiculously slippery.
bing5500
Feb 6 2008, 07:08 PM
It is a muscle car so the performance is most important...but damn, that is a disappointing interior & steering wheel. Doesn't look ergonomically friendly at all.
Halflifehavock13
Feb 6 2008, 09:44 PM
/tear I'm sad to see that they didnt implement that sexy shifter from the concept. Oh well, the outside is still nice.
Dr. Strangelove
Feb 7 2008, 07:31 AM
Looks great, so it will sell like crazy, but no thanks. 4,000 pounds? I didn't expect it to be a sports car, but damn that's a huge bitch.
Razor
Feb 7 2008, 01:53 PM
As far as I can tell, only the looks, the burnouts, and the sound do it real justice.
Synesthesia
Feb 9 2008, 08:02 AM
QUOTE(duality @ Feb 6 2008, 12:51 PM)

What a horrendous interior. It looks fine...but a bit bloated might I add.
Yeah, it looks fatter than the original...and these cars were huge! It does look pretty damn cool, especially the second batch of pictures. That interior though...oh god. They didn't even try to make it retro.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.