how about this trail boss. why dont we set up an intensive screening program that really focuses on a new member's aptitude in the arts, sciences and literature. we'll require a 10 page dissertation that will be carefully reviewed by a panel of oxford PhD's after which a beefed up version of the SAT math section will be given. if the member in question cannot come up with material worthy of publication in at least 3 different academic journals and score a 790 or higher in math, they will be publically shamed and forever banned from the forum, not by IP, but by DNA fingerprinting.
no you say? oh, well. then i suppose we should just keep locking ridiculous threads as they are created because it seems as though no one has the power to raise the general intelligence and courtesy of the internet population. we have a set of rules already, if you'd like them stickied in every forum as a constant reminder, so be it. but in general, i dont really think this place has fallen into the clutches of a 3rd grade class hyped on caffeine.
the only dramatic solution i could think of to 99% assure ourselves of good moderation would be to hire someone full time. the mods/admins on here have classes, or jobs, or even families to attend to. banning some punk on DS is (typically) secondary to these things.
in conclusion, i agree with you somewhat, but in the end i feel as though there isnt a hell of a lot that a few members can do. and that whole sarcastic bit a the beginning was more for my amusement than anything, so dont freak out.