Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: BMW testing, a first for Benefield Anechoic Chamber
Dieselstation Car Forums > Parking Lot > The Car Garage
PBB
This is some pretty crazy stuff, really shows how much it takes to design even the ugliest crap cars. X.gif

Some background on what the BAF is:

QUOTE
Benefield Anechoic Facility

The Benefield Anechoic Facility (BAF) supports installed systems testing for avionics test programs requiring a large, shielded chamber with radio frequency (RF) absorption capability that simulates free space.


BAF cutaway

The BAF is an ideal ground test facility to investigate and evaluate anomalies associated with EW systems, avionics, tactical missiles and their host platforms. Tactical-sized, single or multiple, or large vehicles can be operated in a controlled electromagnetic (EM) environment with emitters on and sensors stimulated while RF signals are recorded and analyzed. The largest platforms tested at the BAF have been the B-52 and C-17 aircraft. The BAF supports testing of other types of systems such as spacecraft, tanks, satellites, air defense systems, drones and armored vehicles.

The BAF equipment generates RF signals with a wide variety of characteristics, simulating red/blue/gray (unfriendly/friendly/unknown) surface-based, sea-based, and airborne systems. With the combination of signals and control functions available, a wide variety of test conditions can be emulated. Many conditions that are not available on outdoor ranges can be easily generated from the aspect of signal density, pulse density and number of simultaneous types.

Through the use of environmental monitoring systems, an independent agency captures, records, and verifies RF generated signals. These systems have the capabilities for real-time and post-test RF signal parameter measurement, instrument display recording, data analysis and test coordination, as well as providing the data for signal verification.


This C-17 Globemaster III was undergoing testing in the Benefield Anechoic Facility Sept. 8 through 15 for a third round of Electromagnetic Interference and Electromagnetic Compatibility testing.


For the first time ever, an F/A-22 from the Combined Test Force at Edwards sits in the Benefield Anechoic Facility during an electromagnetic compatibility assessment on the aircraft's communications systems. The successful series of tests wrapped up July 16 after testers gathered data to characterize unintentional electromagnetic emissions that are emitted from the aircraft in various operational modes.


How BMW used the BAF:

QUOTE
12/19/03 EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif.
The Benefield Anechoic Facility was used for the first time as an automobile test bed, when BMW of North America evaluated its 2004 5- and 6-series models at Edwards in early November.


The Benefield Anechoic Facility tested three BMW 2004 models marking the first-ever automobile tested at the facility. From left to right; the 530i, 645i and 545i were in the chamber this November for electromagnetic interference testing.

What began as an online search by BMW for an anechoic test facility, resulted in members from the BAF and BMW teaming up to test levels of electromagnetic interference on the 530i, 545i and debut model, 645i.

"European standards require vehicles to be certified to meet stringent radio frequency emissions limits, and we have to test our cars under a variety of conditions," explained Volker Bochen, BMW senior test engineer.

RF emissions were assessed through electromagnetic interference/electromagnetic compatibility, or EMI/EMC, testing, according to Colin Young, 412th Test Wing Electronics Warfare site chief.

BAF testing measured and evaluated the RF emissions surrounding the cars' antennas, while each car was parked with the ignition switch in three distinct configurations - in the "on," "start" or "engine running" position, according to Young.

"We were able to set up the test, prepare the associated equipment and complete testing on three vehicles [a 530i, a 545i and new 645i]," stated Ed Roush, 412th TW EW test engineer. "All three cars were tested in one day."

The BAF is the world's largest anechoic chamber for testing airborne electronic warfare systems, according to Dr. James Brownlow, 412th TW EW engineering manager.

Capitalizing on the test techniques and capabilities used to evaluate airborne weapon systems, we were able to transition a unique military asset to the commercial sector, said Lt. Col. Lyn McNeely, 412th TW EW director of operations, battlespace operations division.

"Normally, BMW performs anechoic testing in Munich, Germany," Brownlow said, "but BMW read about the BAF, and we were able to accommodate the testing right here at Edwards."

BMW of North America has several offices in California - the Technology Office in Palo Alto, Designworks in Newbury Park and the Engineering and Emission Test Center in Oxnard.

Together these offices make the California Innovation Triangle, according to the BMW Group's Web site, www.bmw.com.

With its proximity to Edwards, BMW may return to the BAF in the future, stated Brownlow.

"They'll probably come back again," said Brownlow. "The results from the BAF were comparable to the anechoic chamber in Munich, and we provided a quick turn-around for testing as well."

Sources with high-res pictures available:
http://www.edwards.af.mil/capabilities/docs_html/baf.html
http://www.edwards.af.mil/archive/2003/200...ve-bmw_baf.html
http://www.edwards.af.mil/archive/2005/200...ve-c17_baf.html
http://www.edwards.af.mil/archive/2004/200...raptor_baf.html
goota
freakin cool.
PBB
I found some more pics of this BAF facility, all those pics above are really dark and don't give the true size of this place.

QUOTE


7/24/02 – EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. – The CV-22 is suspended in place for electronic warfare testing inside the Benefield Anechoic Facility at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. The aircraft was towed into the facility in early July and testing is expected to continue through September. Called Ship 9, the aircraft is one of two CV-22s at Edwards. The other, Ship 7, will be resuming flight testing later this summer.


A C-130J sits in the Benefield Anechoic Facility during an integrated defensive systems test. On Sept. 12, a Hercules from an Air National Guard unit in Baltimore, MD., rolled into the BAF to undergo a week of ground testing on its newly installed defensive systems. Open air testing began Tuesday at China Lake Naval Weapons Center.

Sources with high-res pics available:
http://www.edwards.af.mil/archive/2002/200...22_hanging.html
http://www.edwards.af.mil/archive/2003/200..._defensive.html
http://www.edwards.af.mil/archive/2002/200...asses_test.html
goota
lol a CV-22, i love those things, so freakin nuts
porsche944
so what does the building do in english?
tune
Has anyone got a pic of that B-52 on a spike, I think it's at an airbase near Colorado Springs somewhere.
leif
I thought the CV-22 was scrapped because of serious stability issues in the hover/fly transition.

and this facility is kinda neat...I have heard of Russian missiles which lock on to the EM interferance created by a plane...which negates the effects of stealth technology. Rumor has it thats how those F117s were taken down in the Balkins.
TrueSlideXL
It actually had something to do with the rain....
Can anyone find a pic of an A10 in there for me?
leif
^rain...which are we talking about...F117s or CV-22s?

if its the F117, F117s dont fly in the rain, cuz it messes with their surface reflection, in addition to the fact that their control surfaces are too complicated to work in shitty weather conditions...they are strictly clear sky flyers...which is their main disadvantage.
TrueSlideXL
Yeah, that f117 was shot down only 13km from ancient radar stations. There was moisture in the air and a damn good commander who figured out their bombing schedule, and he used the old radar to take the plane down at the right moment.
leif
I have heard different reports, but dont have anything to back that up...
DZ302
QUOTE(porsche944 @ Mar 30 2006, 02:39 AM) *
so what does the building do in english?


it absorbs radio waves so they can test airplanes as if they were in the air
350Z
The F/A 22 Raptor is the shit, one day I dream of piloting one.
PBB
QUOTE(porsche944 @ Mar 30 2006, 05:39 AM) *
so what does the building do in english?

The BAF is a building that is a radio emissions vacuum, the walls don't allow any outside radio waves of any kind to penetrate. This allows hypersensative equipment to measure even the slightest electromagnetic emissions given off by equipment, typically airplanes. The BAF chamber allowed BMW to test how much radio frequency level emissions the cars gave off of their antennae due to all their complex electrical equipment. It's pretty much the same deal as the warning labels you'll find on the back of remote controls and such. "This device must not cause radio interference and must accept interference even if it causes undesirable operation." Cars have to comply with those radio emissions laws also. BMW normally does their testing of this type in Germany but they have been using the BAF at this airbase in California because BMW already has three large scale engineering centers in California.
Make sense now?

QUOTE(leif @ Mar 30 2006, 09:26 AM) *
I thought the CV-22 was scrapped because of serious stability issues in the hover/fly transition.

It was. Look at the date on those sources, they're all at least 3 years old.

QUOTE(TrueSlideXL @ Mar 30 2006, 10:24 AM) *
Can anyone find a pic of an A10 in there for me?

I swear I saw an A10 in the BAF but I can't find the pic now.
http://www.edwards.af.mil/
Maybe you'll have better luck.
infinity
So what exactly does BMW need it to test?
Goat
wtf are all those spikes
PBB
Foam spikes are typically for sound absorption, they prevent sound from reflecting and being being picked up by microphones in recording studios. The same applies here but the spikes are to prevent the reflection of the radio waves. Radio waves bouncing off the walls back to the monitoring and recording equipment would create the exact type of interference the BAF was designed to prevent.
Mitlov
QUOTE(tune @ Mar 30 2006, 04:16 AM) *
Has anyone got a pic of that B-52 on a spike, I think it's at an airbase near Colorado Springs somewhere.

It's at the Air Force Academy. A google image search for "b-52 air force academy" will bring up plenty of photos.

Megadeus
QUOTE(leif @ Mar 30 2006, 06:26 AM) *
I thought the CV-22 was scrapped because of serious stability issues in the hover/fly transition.

Nope, the Pentagon approved production of the V-22 back in September.
leif
it looks like your right, I guess they solved the instability issues they were having. Its been a while since I kept up on Military Aircraft developments.

According to the site, it was a matter of beefing up the Hydrolics to be able to deal with the transition from vertical takeoff to horizontal flight, and re train pilots to poerate it properly...apparently it is very easy for the rotors to start taking air from one another, creating a vacume, eliminating their lift creating potential.
PBB
huh.gif It was so close to being killed off too.
This quote on the bottom of every page on that site is pretty sad really:

"To those who have toiled in support of the V-22 program and those who made the ultimate sacrifice."

Ultimate sacrifice, ei. test pilots who died trying to make the V22 a reality.
leif
yep...several fatal crashes...

but that is what you get in a modern bidding system, where the contract goes to the guys who can promise the most gadgets for the least coin.

IMO the same thing happend with the JSF project. Boeing had the best design, which had the best capabilities, based on advancements of current technology...but Lockhed Martin got the contrat, because the per-unit cost was so much lowwer...the boeing was 2 pieces of CF glued together...very cool


where is the replacement for the F18, F16 and Harrier we were promised...not yet ready.
Mitlov
I'm really glad we're spending billions on R&D for high-tech aircraft when our troops on the ground are underpaid, sometimes undertrained, and often underequipped...

QUOTE
where is the replacement for the F18, F16 and Harrier we were promised...not yet ready.

An F-18 replacement wouldn't matter one whit in counter-insurgency fights like Iraq and Afghanistan. Better body armor, better training, and a replacement for the Humvee would save lives.
leif
^or maybe not fucking being there in the first place...but now that the region has gone to shit...and its your responcibility to fix it...ya...equip your troops better.

When you have soilders buying their own body armour...something is wrong...I also think i heard a story of units going out with 1 magazine per soilder...remember "enemy at the gates"

"2 men to a gun, when the first man is killed the second man picks up the gun and starts shooting"

ya...thats not too far off.
Mitlov
QUOTE(leif @ Mar 31 2006, 10:55 AM) *
^or maybe not fucking being there in the first place...but now that the region has gone to shit...and its your responcibility to fix it...ya...equip your troops better.

The wisdom of the Iraq War is highly debatable, to say the least, but Afghanistan really isn't. The real threat right now is from groups like (but not limited to) al-Qaeda--as well as governments that harbor them. So while the exact location of the fighting may change, the nature of the fighting (counter-insurgency) will not change--at least for a good while. The fact is, modern war has nothing to do with Cold War technology. We've known this since Somalia and our military really hasn't adjusted. The military is still building stuff to fight Mother Russia--VTOL jets and stealth helecopters--none of which matters one ounce when the battles are in third-world back alleys.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.