moe
Dec 21 2005, 01:36 AM
QUOTE
Customizer Mallett Stuffs 600-hp Into Pontiac Solstice
Date posted: 12-20-2005
BEREA, Ohio — Mallett, the Ohio producer of custom Cadillacs and Corvettes, has kicked the Pontiac Solstice up a notch with a V8 engine as the centerpiece of several performance packages ranging in price from $18,000 to $38,995.
The packages, which the tuner says adds "all the horsepower of the Corvette crammed into the Pontiac Solstice," are available now.
The base engine in the Solstice is a 2.4-liter four-cylinder that makes 177 horsepower. The Mallett Solstice standard features include GM's V8 LS2 engine that is rated at 400 horsepower at 6,000 rpm and 400 lb-ft of torque at 4,400 rpm. The base package includes high-performance brake pads, a short-throw shifter, Luk Gold clutch, and Mallett graphics on the seat headrests. Optional equipment includes a six-speed Tremac transmission, 19-inch alloy wheels and tires, and a supercharger.
The top-of-the-line Solstice conversion package includes GM's supercharged 600-hp LS2 V8, modified shock absorbers and performance springs, stainless-steel mufflers, Mallett body graphics, and custom number plaque and badging.
What this means to you: Mallett beefs up the Solstice with a big dose of horsepower.

source:
Inside Line
Phix
Dec 21 2005, 09:45 AM
Wait. So putting in a 400hp into a car designed for 177hp and they just give you dinky new tyres to compensate?
They should have offered new suspension components throughout their package.
600 HP? HO-LEEEEEE SHIET!! wow, that's gotta be insane world class performance. I'd be afraid to drive that thing...
Cyclone
Dec 21 2005, 10:22 AM
That's a lot of power for such a small car. And I hate to say this but I wouldnt wnt 600hp in that car. I mean, it's just too small a car for that power. Sure, i bet it goes like hell but it's no faster in the corners than a regular Solstice would be. If anyhting it'd probably be slower since you'd have to be more careful on the throttle.
z0ne
Dec 21 2005, 10:26 AM
very true, cyclone .. i think it may be the same principle as that car that nismo was going to get .. it was a 5 litre mustang V8 in an MX5 .. i think in both of the cars, the solistice and the MX5, there is too much weight in the front, and too much power in such a small car
but on the other hand, must be tons of fun for a nice highway car
goldenjackal
Dec 21 2005, 10:32 AM
moe
Dec 21 2005, 10:46 AM
I'm sure it can be modified to handle the power, but it's just not the point of the car. It's supposed to be a fun, affordable roadster. Handling is much more important than power ever will be in a car like this, and anyone cramming in a V8 is missing the point. If someone wanted a fun, powerful roadster they'd probably just get a Corvette convertible to start with.
Randle2I
Dec 21 2005, 11:43 AM
QUOTE(moethepaki @ Dec 21 2005, 10:46 AM)

I'm sure it can be modified to handle the power, but it's just not the point of the car. It's supposed to be a fun, affordable roadster. Handling is much more important than power ever will be in a car like this, and anyone cramming in a V8 is missing the point. If someone wanted a fun, powerful roadster they'd probably just get a Corvette convertible to start with.
So the Cobra missed the point? What about everyone that mods their civics & cobalts? Isn't the point behind something like this to simply have fun & push the limits of what you can do? Not everyone is going to take their car to the local SCCA event & needs for the car to handle like it's on rails. Most of the time people wont even use 50% of it's power, the point is simply that they can.
clarkma5
Dec 21 2005, 12:45 PM
This car would be better with just the standard LS2...the supercharged one is just overkill.
And though people talk about it being a lot of power for the car, remember the stock Solstice is WAY over-tired for its power, so you bump that size up a bit and make the tires nice and sticky, combined with a good modified suspension, and you should be able to handle that V8 grunt pretty well.
moe
Dec 21 2005, 01:12 PM
QUOTE(Randle2I @ Dec 21 2005, 10:43 PM)

So the Cobra missed the point? What about everyone that mods their civics & cobalts? Isn't the point behind something like this to simply have fun & push the limits of what you can do? Not everyone is going to take their car to the local SCCA event & needs for the car to handle like it's on rails. Most of the time people wont even use 50% of it's power, the point is simply that they can.
Even Shelby said the Cobra would kill you in a second, but that was part of its character. The Cobra was a great car, so I guess with that you have a fair point. But I didn't say that the car had to handle on rails, it's just I think all the power would dilute the appeal of a roadster such as the Solstice as it would the Miata or the Lotus Elise. If people won't use 50% of the power most of the time, why bother? It's not like the stock Solstice was a sloth or anythng. I'm also not a big fan of modified Civics or Cobalts...but I mean, whatever floats your boat because that's just personal preference. I'd just save the money from the mods, and get a nicer car instead of gradually pouring money into an econobox.
Halflifehavock13
Dec 23 2005, 11:48 AM
Holy crap I want that sooooo bad even if its completely impractical.
McKhaos
Dec 23 2005, 12:45 PM
That would be an insane drifter .
Pking688
Dec 23 2005, 12:46 PM
Mazda Killer
DakianDelomast
Dec 23 2005, 12:58 PM
That much power in a car that can't hold itself on the road is simply dangerous.
nismo
Dec 23 2005, 01:46 PM
QUOTE(z0ne @ Dec 21 2005, 01:26 PM)

i think it may be the same principle as that car that nismo was going to get .. it was a 5 litre mustang V8 in an MX5 .. there is too much weight in the front, and too much power in such a small car
When I was looking up the information on it, the site said it had a 48/52 weight distribution after relocating the battery to the back.
Cyclone
Dec 23 2005, 01:53 PM
QUOTE(nismo @ Dec 23 2005, 04:46 PM)

When I was looking up the information on it, the site said it had a 48/52 weight distribution after relocating the battery to the back.
That's kinda stupid actually, why dont they leave the battery in the front to have more neutral weight distro?
Also I know that guy a few posts above did NOT compair a fucking Cobra to a modified Civic....
The thing is, the Cobra was built from the ground up to handle the power. The Solstice wasnt really. It's like people pulling the rotary engine out of an RX7 and putting a big beefy V8 in it... It just RUINS the car.
Halflifehavock13
Dec 25 2005, 06:22 PM
/\ It doesnt mean it wouldnt be FUN.
BankieVR6
Dec 25 2005, 09:02 PM
fun, like group B rally car fun. haha, i foresee many accidental deaths in that car...
Phix
Dec 25 2005, 10:12 PM
QUOTE(BankieVR6 @ Dec 26 2005, 12:02 AM)

fun, like group B rally car fun. haha, i foresee many accidental deaths in that car...
Atleast Group B rally cars had some sort of SENSE of balance.
I bet this one would just feel dumb. Not even scary-- just dumb.
Cyclone
Dec 26 2005, 12:52 AM
QUOTE(Halflifehavock13 @ Dec 25 2005, 09:22 PM)

/\ It doesnt mean it wouldnt be FUN.
I'm sure it would be fun if you like facing the wrong way in turns. It's just way too much power for such a small car.
DZ302
Dec 26 2005, 02:32 AM
QUOTE(moethepaki @ Dec 21 2005, 01:12 PM)

Even Shelby said the Cobra would kill you in a second, but that was part of its character. The Cobra was a great car, so I guess with that you have a fair point. But I didn't say that the car had to handle on rails, it's just I think all the power would dilute the appeal of a roadster such as the Solstice as it would the Miata or the Lotus Elise. If people won't use 50% of the power most of the time, why bother? It's not like the stock Solstice was a sloth or anythng. I'm also not a big fan of modified Civics or Cobalts...but I mean, whatever floats your boat because that's just personal preference. I'd just save the money from the mods, and get a nicer car instead of gradually pouring money into an econobox.
the 427 cobras handled like ass but made up for it on the straights, it was the 289s that could handle
marcos_eirik
Dec 26 2005, 04:28 AM
QUOTE(DZ302 @ Dec 26 2005, 02:32 AM)

the 427 cobras handled like ass but made up for it on the straights, it was the 289s that could handle
But if the straight was long enough, like the Mulsanne at Le Mans, it would kill you anyway because the rear end would lift off at ~150 mph... Therefore they made the Daytona coupe, a car that could handle the power...
høgh
Dec 26 2005, 05:00 AM
QUOTE(Pking688 @ Dec 23 2005, 09:46 PM)

Mazda Killer
No. First of all, as it have been stated several times already, it's stupid with this much power in a small car like this. Second, if someone wanted to, I'm sure they could fit a V8 in a MX-5 too.
DZ302
Dec 26 2005, 06:03 PM
QUOTE(marcos_eirik @ Dec 26 2005, 04:28 AM)

But if the straight was long enough, like the Mulsanne at Le Mans, it would kill you anyway because the rear end would lift off at ~150 mph... Therefore they made the Daytona coupe, a car that could handle the power...
the front was what lifted. you definitely wouldn't want to encounter any shifts in the road or anything at 150mph in that car. the cobra roadster probably had the worst aerodynamics of any sports car in the 60s and on
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.