http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/article/0...78330_1,00.html

He gave it a 5/5. I actually haven't read the review yet. My eyes... they bleed with sleep.

A rare sight...but again, another clarkson review with a rating that is basically unjustified by the text.

two and a third pages until he gets to the fucking car review? i'm never reading a clarkson article again

hahahah that was quite a rant mr clarkson.

Clarkson only have two settings:

If he likes the car, the review is: Rant, rant, rant, rant, and at the very end "but i still love the car".

If he doesn't like the car (mostly because of some stupid prejudice): Praise, praise, praise, praise and at the very end "BUT! This and this is wrong and therefor it completely sucks!"

That's why I never listen to him, and when he reviews cars that I like in Top Gear, I usually just enjoy the beatiful filming.

I TG's filming. I often look at their film angles and stuff and try to figure out how to do photography in the same way.

i want an R32.

I think his reviews are entertaining, if I want all the technical stuff I'll go read every other car mag.

and yes, I also want an R32...probably not going to be in Canada again?